jimmyj wrote: ↑Sun Jun 04, 2023 1:35 pm Remember, copyrights are not necessarily when a shirt is printed, they are the date the artwork was copywritten.

https://www.defunkd.com/copyrights-on-vintage-t-shirts/

Doesn't this product look like a fake(specifically about the tag)?

No probs here! Tag is legit. Print is good. With both of those checking out, I wouldn't worry about stitching. Remember that Brockum and others used different blanks...they didn't make their own. More about it here. https://www.defunkd.com/single-stitch/ Thank you. As someone who loves vintage tees ...

I've been comparing the original's tag and printing all day, and there doesn't seem to be any issue. However, both the hem and sleeves are single-stitched. While I learned that Brockum's sleeves are single-stitched and the hem is double-stitched, an expert mentioned that there could be variations in ...

A few days ago, I purchased a Red Zeppelin shirt from eBay for international shipping. The printed year on the shirt is 1995, but the tag used is from 1997 onwards. I'm curious to know if this is a case of a reissued shirt after '95 or if it's simply a counterfeit shirt. I am seriously considering ...