Page 1 of 1

A Few Finds to Look Over

Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2014 9:57 pm
by studiolano
Hey everyone, hope you are doing well :)
I obtained these shirts recently and need some info about them if possible.
The first shirt is a tri-blend, although not a traditional tri-blend, Buckaroo Banzai sweatshirt. I am thinking in the $50 range with perhaps a 10 day auction.
Front
Front
Back
Back
Tag
Tag
This next one is probably nothing but I was a bit curious what the gang here would think. It is a 1990 Harley shirt from the first and oldest Harley dealership in the USA. Thoughts?
Front
Front
Back
Back
Date
Date
This one is a mystery to me. It appears to be a vintage Slayer shirt but I cannot find another example of their logo not being reproduced as the classic logo. This one looks kind of spray painted on but the classic logo looks a lot different. Thoughts?
Front
Front
Date
Date
Tag
Tag

Re: A Few Finds to Look Over

Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2014 9:59 pm
by studiolano
One more :)

This one is just plain weird. It is a Addams Family print on a Hobie blank. Thoughts?
Front
Front
Tag
Tag
Any help is always and truly appreciated :)
Thank you

Re: A Few Finds to Look Over

Posted: Tue Jul 08, 2014 11:02 am
by jimmyj
Buckaroo I would keep fixed price with offers - sweats have mostly been a wait for the right buyer situation. Even auctioning a buckaroo shirt can be risky.

The harley, dudley perkins. nothing to write home to mom about. But you should still write home to mom, she misses you. A little value there but the front design is pretty boring.

Slayer, some value - what's the date on the copyright? looks like late 90s? All their vintage stuff seems to bring in bux.

addams family...thing. Not sure why the Hobie print, but sometimes promo tees landed on random blanks...overstock, etc. Someone will def. want it.

Re: A Few Finds to Look Over

Posted: Tue Jul 08, 2014 2:36 pm
by studiolano
Thanks for the super fast reply and great info J. The date on the Slayer shirt appears to be 1990 or 1999 but it is so faded I could not get a decent photo of it. I think it is the latter as that seems to fit with that version of the Tultex tag.
Thanks again Mr J :)