-
- Posts: 548
- Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 7:29 am
- Location: Montreal/Honduras
- Contact:
Vintage T-shirt Sizing and Value
When trading vintage with others I often hear "X would be worth more, had it been a size small". I don't really understand why, I'm a little larger myself and good vintage tees in an L-XL are quite difficult to find. Can anyone provide some perspective on this?
Have vintage Elvis tees? Let me know!
Re: Vintage T-shirt Sizing and Value
Really? That's weird I always say the reverse...t-shirts usually fetch more the bigger size...because more people can wear them.
Jimmy J
(Please note: Legit checks I do in this forum should not be considered 100% conclusive; I'm simply giving a gut reaction based on the limited information provided.)
(Please note: Legit checks I do in this forum should not be considered 100% conclusive; I'm simply giving a gut reaction based on the limited information provided.)
-
- Posts: 310
- Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 4:41 pm
- Location: Los Angeles
- Contact:
Re: Vintage T-shirt Sizing and Value
Unless you sell to the Asian market. Here in LA, especially around the flea markets, a Small-Medium is a lot more desirable than a Large or XL.
-
- Posts: 548
- Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 7:29 am
- Location: Montreal/Honduras
- Contact:
Re: Vintage T-shirt Sizing and Value
Yeah, they're asian. Weird..
Have vintage Elvis tees? Let me know!
-
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 11:38 pm
- Location: Las Vegas
- Contact:
Re: Vintage T-shirt Sizing and Value
I always seem to find shirts i'm looking for in a L or XL. And i'm a small so a vintage medium (70s or 80s) fits me perfectly and is ALWAYS harder to find for me (the collector) and more expensive when they do pop up. I'm guessing maybe when they printed up the shirts they ordered more in the bigger sizes (a modern day medium or whatever) to appeal to the general public's build and ordered less smaller ones. I had a clothing company for a short awhile before the overheard became too much and this is how i did it.
So basically my guess is that there is just simply less floating around of the smaller sizes.
So basically my guess is that there is just simply less floating around of the smaller sizes.
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 0 Replies
- 2540 Views
-
Last post by timetraveltees
-
- 0 Replies
- 5887 Views
-
Last post by The_fridge
-
- 2 Replies
- 4053 Views
-
Last post by trelalakers
-
- 1 Replies
- 3904 Views
-
Last post by jimmyj
-
- 1 Replies
- 284 Views
-
Last post by jimmyj